Discussion Papers, Policy Papers, Books & Reports, Bulletin, Newsletter, Economic Policy Lunchtime Meetings, Workshops & Conferences, Events Diary, Previous Events Programme Areas, Current Research Projects, Networks, Vacancies Programme Directors, Researchers Lists, Noticeboard Press Releases, Coverage, Request a Press Release Data?, Resources for Economists, Data on Other sites Membership information Login, Create a Profile, Profile Benefits, Your Profile Settings, Forgot Your Password? Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback How to find us, Frequently Asked Questions, ESRC Site Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, Vacancies, How to Search Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback CEPR Home Page You have items in your shopping cart.  Click to view your cart
Google


DP3879 The Effectiveness of Structural Policy in the European Union: An Empirical Analysis for the EU-15 during the Period 1995-2001

Author(s): Maaike Beugelsdijk , Sylvester C. W. Eijffinger
Publication Date: April 2003
Keyword(s): convergence , european union , EU enlargement , structural policy
JEL(s): E10 , E37 , E60
Programme Areas: International Macroeconomics
Link to this Page: www.cepr.org/pubs/dps/DP3879.asp


The main aim of Structural Policy is to decrease the regional disparities within the European Union. In 2004 it is expected that ten new member countries join the EU. It is expected that this enlargement will cause strong regional disparities within the Union. For this reason the distribution of the financial support by Structural Policy will undergo drastic changes. In this study we considered two main themes. First, convergence of the current EU-member countries is empirically tested, for the period 1995-2002, and the effect of the Structural Funds in this context is identified. Structural Funds seem to have had a positive impact and poorer countries (like Greece) seem to have caught up with the richer countries. The importance of the Structural Funds in this respect can therefore not be neglected. Second, we touch upon the problem of moral hazard and the substitution effect. It may be expected that receivers of Structural Funds in some cases are not really eligible and may therefore use the Funds inefficiently. Our first and preliminary results seem to indicate that the less clean countries (or as we measure it, more ‘corrupt’ countries) of the current EU-15 do not gain less economic growth from the Structural Funds. The hypothesis that Structural Funds contributed to less interregional disparities within the current 15 European countries cannot be rejected. This might mean the intended plans of channelling a big share of the Funds to the candidate countries in 2007-13 will probably contribute to higher economic growth in these countries.


Full text Search:
Enter a DP Number:

Access other features of the site by loging in with your personal profile. Purchase a copy of the paper in PDF format. Purchase a printed copy of the paper. How to subscribe to the CEPR Discussion Paper series Send an email to a colleague with details of the paper. Obtain Plain Text details of this paper which you can copy in to a word document or email allowing you to easily cite this paper! Help in purchasing and downloading papers. CEPR RSS feeds information page.

Your current location: Publications > Discussion Papers
Top CEPR, 53-56 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DG
United Kingdom.
Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801     Fax: +44 (0)20 7183 8820
Email: cepr@cepr.org     Webmaster: webmaster@cepr.org
Home
With the support of the European Union: Support for bodies active at European level in the field of active European citizenship