|
‘Ratify the Treaty of Nice to Clear up the Mess it Created’
‘Did the leaders of the
European Union know what they were doing in Nice at 4.30am on 11
December last year?’ The answer is probably ‘No’. Yet the Treaty
should still be ratified since it is ‘repairable’ and failing to
pass it would delay Eastern enlargement. This is the conclusion of four
leading economists in a report in the series Monitoring European
Integration, just published by the Centre for Economic Policy
Research.
Every parliament in
Europe has to vote on this flawed Treaty and the report is aimed at
informing these decisions. The authors argue that ‘The Treaty of Nice
was no better than a ‘nice try’. It failed to adjust EU
decision-making to the realities of a Union with 27+ members, but it did
open the door to enlargement. It should be ratified and then repaired.’
The report identifies
four critical areas where the Treaty fails:
- Council decision-making reform
actually
made things worse. ‘The EU’s ability to act post-enlargement would
have been greater with no reform at all.’
- Commission reform
was makeshift, temporary and postponed the hard decisions.
- Extension of qualified majority voting
was little more than a
house-cleaning exercise with little or no change in sensitive areas.
- The ECB’s ‘numbers problem’.
Enlargement gives the European Central Bank’s Governing Council the
same ‘numbers problem’ as the European Commission. The Treaty did
not fix this problem, so enlargement (without reform) will hinder the
ECB from taking difficult decisions at the right time.
In spite of these grave
problems, the authors say, ‘Institutional reforms can wait; Eastern
enlargement should not…’ The East-West division of Europe is the
last relic of the cold war and only Eastern enlargement can remove it.
‘Enlargement is a historical imperative. Council voting weights will
be a historical footnote.’
Moreover, the report
argues that the Treaty is repairable. The two most important ‘emergency
repairs’ that should be agreed are:
- The IGC in 2004 should re-adjust
Council of Ministers’ voting procedures, lowering the majority
threshold from 74% of votes to two-thirds. This would restore the
Council’s ability to act.
- The ECB’s numbers problems should be
fixed soon. The report recommends that interest rate setting power
be transferred to the Executive Board.
The report adds that
killing the Treaty ‘would recreate the situation that led to the Nice
mess in the first place’. By contrast, if the Treaty becomes law,
enlargement will happen and this will focus minds on the need to repair
EU decision-making. Moreover, if the new members are allowed a say in
the repairs, the agreed reforms are likely to be more sustainable.
Notes for Editors:
CEPR
is a network of over 500 Research Fellows based throughout Europe, who
collaborate through the Centre in research and its dissemination. CEPR
helps its Research Fellows to develop projects, obtain their funding,
administer them and disseminate their results. The Centre’s research
ranges from open economy macroeconomics to trade policy, from the
economic transformation of Central and Eastern Europe to regionalism in
the world economy. For further information about CEPR, please contact
Rita Gilbert, Tel: (44 20) 7878 2917 or email: rgilbert@cepr.org,
or contact James Morgan, Tel: (44 20) 8225 7262. Visit our website for a
copy of this document or for additional services: http://www.cepr.org
The Authors:
Richard Baldwin is
Professor of Economics at the Graduate Institute of International
Studies, Geneva and is also a Programme Director in CEPR’s
International Trade research programme. Erik Berglöf is Director
of the Stockholm Institute of Transition Economics (SITE) at the
Stockholm School of Economics and is also a Research Fellow in CEPR’s
Financial Economics and Transition Economics research programmes. Francesco
Giavazzi is Professor of Economics at IGIER, Università Bocconi in
Milan and is also a Research Fellow in CEPR’s International
Macroeconomics research programme. Mika Widgrén is Professor of
Economics at the Turku School of Economics and Business Administration,
Turku and is also a Research Fellow in CEPR’s International Trade
research programme.
Nice Try: Should the Treaty of Nice be Ratified?
Monitoring European Integration 11
|