Discussion Papers, Policy Papers, Books & Reports, Bulletin, Newsletter, Economic Policy Lunchtime Meetings, Workshops & Conferences, Events Diary, Previous Events Programme Areas, Current Research Projects, Networks, Vacancies Programme Directors, Researchers Lists, Noticeboard Press Releases, Coverage, Request a Press Release Data?, Resources for Economists, Data on Other sites Membership information Login, Create a Profile, Profile Benefits, Your Profile Settings, Forgot Your Password? Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback How to find us, Frequently Asked Questions, ESRC Site Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, Vacancies, How to Search Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback CEPR Home Page You have items in your shopping cart.  Click to view your cart
Google
http://cepr.org/

UDROP – NEW FINANCIAL ARCHITECTURE

The world could be spared some of the worst effects of major international financial crises if debtors were given a breathing space to meet their obligations when credit markets seize up. A paper published by the Centre for Economic Policy Research develops the concept of a debt rollover option for foreign currency borrowers. This would limit the destructive consequences for the real economy of a crisis of the kind that occurred two years ago in East Asia. The authors, Professors Willem Buiter of the Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee and Cambridge University, and Anne Sibert of Birkbeck College, University of London, call their version UDROP (Universal Debt Rollover Option with a Penalty).

In essence, a foreign currency borrower would, when the debt matures, be able to defer repayment for a fixed period through the exercise of a debt rollover option.  The terms of the rollover would be negotiated with the creditor at the same time as the original loan. The option would be exercised at the discretion of the debtor.  The proposal aims to prevent solvent borrowers being forced into unnecessary and socially costly default by a rollover crisis brought about by disorderly financial markets.  It will improve global economic performance to the extent that it helps countries that are solvent and willing to pay, but are prevented from doing so because international financial and credit markets have a temporary seizure.  Thus South Korea would have benefited from such a scheme, but it would have been irrelevant in the case of Russia, which is insolvent even when financial markets are orderly.

When the crisis struck in 1997, Korea faced huge short-term foreign currency debts which totalled more than the central bank’s reserves. The proposed debt-rollover scheme might have enabled it to work its way out of these short-term financial problems without recourse to the same contractionary measures that inflicted such damage to the real economy from mid-1997 onwards.

This central problem is characteristic of many financial crises. Professors Buiter and Sibert write, ‘UDROP is meant to address the situation where a large number of people all try to leave a room simultaneously through a small door, hotly pursuing a limited number of prizes that will be handed out on a first-come first-served basis.’

The mechanism would be rule-based and negotiable between debtor and creditor. The only involvement of any outside agency might be to declare the existence of disorderly market conditions, which could be made a precondition for the exercise of the option by individual borrowers. Central banks could perform this role at the national, and the IMF at a global, level. 

No further role for the IMF is envisaged in the scheme. It has to be mandatory and universal, partly because of the problem of adverse selection: high quality borrowers might wish to signal their strength by refusing the option. ‘This could limit or destroy the effectiveness of any voluntary, market-based scheme.’  In this sense UDROP is rather like health insurance.

The authors examine many technical features of such a scheme – for example, the possibility of stripping out the option and trading it separately.  Provided rollover options were mandatory for all foreign currency debt contracts, including contingent claims, and provided the rollover were required to cover the full amount of the foreign currency exposure that would arise if the contingencies defining the claim were to materialise, the borrower would not be able to free himself of the rollover obligations. Universality can be achieved by all IMF members agreeing that foreign currency debt contracts without the option would be unenforceable in any members’ courts.

Notes for Editors:

CEPR is a network of over 450 Research Fellows based throughout Europe, who collaborate through the Centre in research and its dissemination. CEPR helps its Research Fellows to develop projects, obtain their funding, administer them and disseminate their results. The Centre’s research ranges from open economy macroeconomics to trade policy, from the economic transformation of Central and Eastern Europe to regionalism in the world economy. For further information about CEPR, please contact Rita Gilbert, External Relations Officer, Tel: (44 20) 7878 2917 or email: rgilbert@cepr.org, or contact James Morgan, Tel: (44 20) 8225 7262.

 

The Authors:

Willem Buiter is Professor of Economics at Cambridge University, a Member of the Monetary Policy Committee of the Bank of England, and a Research Fellow in CEPR’s International Macroeconomics and Transition Economics programmes.  Anne Sibert is Professor of Economics at Birbeck College, University of London.

  UDROP:  A Small Contribution to the New International Financial Architecture
Willem H Buiter and Anne Sibert

CEPR Discussion Paper  No. 2138
£5.00

Available from  

CEPR, 90-98 Goswell Road, London, EC1V 7RR, UK
Tel:  (44 20) 7878 2900  Fax: (44 20) 7878 2999

Email:  orders@cepr.org   Web page: 
http://www.cepr.org

Your current location: Press
Top CEPR, 53-56 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DG
United Kingdom.
Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801     Fax: +44 (0)20 7183 8820
Email: cepr@cepr.org     Webmaster: webmaster@cepr.org
Home
With the support of the European Union: Support for bodies active at European level in the field of active European citizenship