GEI Working Paper Abstracts
Working papers produced by the research projects in
the Global Economic Institutions Programme have begun to
appear. They are available for £4/$8 each from:
Subscriptions Officer, Centre for Economic Policy
Research, 90-98 Goswell Road, London EC1V 7RR, UK.
Papers: [1-5] | [6-10]
| [11-15] | [16-20]
| [21-25] | [26-30] | [31-35] | [36-45]
[46-47]
Working Paper No. 16
Phases of Imitation and Innovation in a North-South
Endogenous Growth Model
by David Currie, Paul Levine, Joseph Pearlman and Michael
Chui
August 1996
In this paper we develop a North/South endogenous growth
model to examine three phases of deevleopment in the
South: imitation of Northern products, imitation and
innovation and finally, innovation only. In particular,
the model has the features of catching up (and
potentially overtaking) which are of particular relevance
to the Pacific Rim economies. We show that the possible
equilibria depend on cross-country assimilation effects
anmd the ease of imitation. We then apply the model to
analyse the impact of R&D subsidies. There are some
clear global policy implications which emerge from our
analysis. First, because subsidies to Southern innovation
benefit the North as well it is beneficial to the North
to pay for some of these subsidies. Second, because the
ability of the South to assimilate Northern knowledge and
innovate depends on the Southern skills levels, the
consequent spillover benefits on growth make the
subsidising of Southern education by the North
particularly attractive.
Working Paper No. 17
An Agenda for the WTO: Strengthening or Overburdening the
System
by Stephen Woolcock
October 1996
In December 96 the first biannual ministerial meeting of
the WTO will take place in Singapore. This meeting will
begin to address some of the key issues facing the WTO in
terms of its future agenda and thus its role in the
international trading system. Underlying the debate on
any specific issue at the Singapore meeting will be the
issue of widening versus deepening of the GATT/WTO rules.
Should the WTO respond to pressure from some of its
developed members and begin talks on new issues, such as
investment, competition and trade and labour standards,
in order to ensure that it keeps up with the continued
internationalization of markets, or should it stress
widening its membership in order to ensure that the
fundamentals of free trade are extended to all countries?
This paper discusses the factors that will shape this
debate, both in the run up to the Singapore meeting and
beyond. It analyses the various agenda items, including
completion of existing work in the WTO, further
liberalization within the realms of existing policies and
the new issues. Ultimately it will be some combination of
these agenda items which will constitute the balance
between widening and deepening the WTO. The paper argues
that the WTO must widen and deepen. This means that no
country or issue can be excluded a priori. But the main
purpose of the paper is to contribute to a wider,
informed debate on the issues. International commercial
diplomacy now affects more and more domestic interests
and yet there us little informed public debate on the
topic. The current talks on the WTO's agenda provides an
opportunity for such a debate and it is hoped that this
paper can make a contribution to such a debate.
Working Paper No. 18
Using a variant of the Cagan model with rational
expectations, this paper shows that expected
stabilization can result in a budget deficit in excess of
the maximum inflation tax. A cap on the deficit dampens
inflation expectations and raises real balances, thus
increasing the yield of the inflation tax for any given
rate of inflation. This study extends the work of Drazen
and Helpman (1990) by including a stochastic budgetary
process and using option pricing theory. It uses
parameter values of the semi-elasticity of demand for
money to provide estimates of the maximum visible real
deficit.
Working Paper No. 19
Seigniorage, Inflation and IMF Intervention
Marcus Miller and Lei Zhang
October 1996
Using a static Barro model, this paper illustrates two
possible reasons causing excessively high inflation in
former Soviet republics: the time consistency problem
facing a government when it plans to use money to finance
deficits and the 'free-rider' problem in the ROUBLE zone
where coordination between the central banks of the
republics was absent. Extending the above model to
incorporate stochastic deficits, this paper derives the
trigger points for various fiscal stabilizations. It
shows that the time consistency problem can be improved
by precommitment and that an outside agency, such as the
IMF, can play a significant role in promoting earlier
stabilization. Two particular mechanisms for the outside
agency are identified: first, its ability to aid the
government to achieve intertemporal credibility by
agreeing on specific plans; and second, its role in
weaning countries off inflationary finance by promoting
fiscal reform.
Working Paper No. 20
Sovereign Debt Buybacks Revisited
Jonathan P Thomas
November 1996
The arguments put forward by Bulow and Rogoff (1988,
1991) against sovereign debt buybacks are re-examined in
a willingness-to-pay framework. This paper argues that
the Bulow-Rogoff framework treats default by a debtor as
an event with no deadweight loss, and, as such,
underestimates the potential gains from a buyback. The
willingness-to-pay framework allows deadweight costs of
default to be introduced in a consistent and simple
fashion into the buybacks calculus. Two versions of this
framework are considered. First, a model in which the
default costs induce an all-or-nothing default decision
is analysed. In this case, an ambiguous result is derived
in which the variability of the debtor's income
determines whether (small) buybacks are beneficial to the
debtor, even though expected total transfers to the
creditor increase, consistent with Bulow-Rogoff. Second,
default costs are modelled so as to induce at most a
partial default. This model corresponds most closely, in
terms of the repayment behaviour of the sovereign debtor,
to the models used by Bulow and Rogoff. It is shown that
small buybacks are always beneficial to the debtor in
this case. The second version is extended to include an
investment opportunity. Only if the country has
sufficiently scarce resources where the investment can be
made, will a buyback be harmful to the interests of the
debtor. Implications concerning the efficacy of donations
for buyout purposes by third parties, such as the World
Bank and the IMF, are analysed.
|