Discussion Papers, Policy Papers, Books & Reports, Bulletin, Newsletter, Economic Policy Lunchtime Meetings, Workshops & Conferences, Events Diary, Previous Events Programme Areas, Current Research Projects, Networks, Vacancies Programme Directors, Researchers Lists, Noticeboard Press Releases, Coverage, Request a Press Release Data?, Resources for Economists, Data on Other sites Membership information Login, Create a Profile, Profile Benefits, Your Profile Settings, Forgot Your Password? Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback How to find us, Frequently Asked Questions, ESRC Site Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, Vacancies, How to Search Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback CEPR Home Page You have items in your shopping cart.  Click to view your cart
Google
http://cepr.org/

EMU and Portfolio Adjustment

‘Europe has 15 stock exchanges, more than 20 derivative markets and no national centre for bond trading.’ In spite of this costly gap facing those who seek pan-European assets, there is still no prospect for the emergence of pan-European securities markets with centralised settlements systems. There is also a vacuum because the European Central Bank has no legal mandate to solve the settlements problem. And would-be pan-European investors face obstacles that are designed to protect domestic markets while governments pursue non-cooperative solutions in their search for integrated bond markets.

These conclusions appear in the latest Policy Paper published by the Centre for Economic Policy Research, prepared by five leading financial market economists in Britain, Switzerland and Italy and discussed by two of the authors, Laura Bottazzi and Jean-Piere Danthine, at a London Lunchtime Meeting on 25 January 2001. The paper offers a unique insight into the economic determinants of the home-bias puzzle in Europe and the ‘unacceptably high’ settlement costs in European markets. It notes: ‘[T]he potential offered by EMU for reducing drastically these costs and the need to take the accompanying measures to reach this goal so as to permit the realisation of a single European capital market are worth emphasising.’ The paper also shows how credit and liquidity risk have assumed greater weight in investment strategy.

On this basis, the Policy Paper adopts Modern Portfolio Theory to discuss further implications of EMU for investment. The authors are tempted ‘to conclude that, as far as asset returns are concerned, the importance of EMU is likely to come to a greater extent from the evolving economic structures that affect return correlations than from the mechanical effect associated with the disappearance of currency risk’. It may well be true that the euro is only a minor event for investors.

Recommendations include the following:

  • Some European authority has to adopt a tougher attitude in achieving an integrated securities market.

  • More action is needed to cut the costs of cross-border investment.

  • Governments should harmonise the issuance calendar and maturity of their bonds. But instead they are competing to attract non-Eurozone capital. ‘The emergence of a single futures contract would be an important step towards an integrated European government bond market.’

But innovation in cross-border transactions and competition between all types of standards should be encouraged, as should cooperation between regulators.

There has been some progress. Important steps include the consolidation of national fiscal budgets and the privatisation of the telecommunications industry. The report says ‘The fiscal framework has paved the way for an improved investment environment. It also gave the European corporate bond markets a much-needed boost’. But it warns: ‘While these efforts should be acknowledged, it should be emphasized as well that such policies should be continued if the efficiency gains expected from the euro are to be fully realized.’

Notes for Editors:

CEPR is a network of over 500 Research Fellows based throughout Europe, who collaborate through the Centre in research and its dissemination. CEPR helps its Research Fellows to develop projects, obtain their funding, administer them and disseminate their results. The Centre’s research ranges from open economy macroeconomics to trade policy, from the economic transformation of Central and Eastern Europe to regionalism in the world economy. For further information about CEPR, please contact Rita Gilbert, Tel: (44 20) 7878 2917 or email: rgilbert@cepr.org, or contact James Morgan, Tel: (44 20) 8225 7262. Visit our website for a copy of this document or for additional services: http://www.cepr.org

The Speakers:

Laura Bottazzi is at IGIER, Università Bocconi in Milan and is also a Research Affiliate in CEPR’s International Macroeconomics research programme. Jean-Pierre Danthine is Professor of Economics at Université de Lausanne and is also a Research Fellow in CEPR’s International Macroeconomics, Financial Economics and Public Policy research programmes.


EMU and Portfolio Adjustment - CEPR Policy Paper 5

by Kpate Adjaouté, Laura Bottazzi, Jean-Pierre Danthine, Andreas Fischer, Rony Hamaui, Richard Portes and Mike Wickens  

ISBN 1 898128 58 8 – £10/$15.00/€15.00

Available from:

CEPR, 90–98 Goswell Road, London EC1V 7RR, UK
Tel: (+ 44 20) 7878 2900  Fax: (+ 44 20) 7878 2999  Email: orders@cepr.org

In North America from:
The Brookings Institution, Dept. 029, Washington DC 20042-0029, USA
Tel: (+ 1 800) 275 1447  Fax: (+1 202) 797 6004

And in Scandinavia from:

SNS Förlag, Box 5629, S–114 86 Stockholm, Sweden
Tel: (+ 46 8) 453 99 50  Fax: (+ 46 8) 20 62 06

 

Your current location: Press
Top CEPR, 53-56 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DG
United Kingdom.
Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801     Fax: +44 (0)20 7183 8820
Email: cepr@cepr.org     Webmaster: webmaster@cepr.org
Home
With the support of the European Union: Support for bodies active at European level in the field of active European citizenship