Discussion Papers, Policy Papers, Books & Reports, Bulletin, Newsletter, Economic Policy Lunchtime Meetings, Workshops & Conferences, Events Diary, Previous Events Programme Areas, Current Research Projects, Networks, Vacancies Programme Directors, Researchers Lists, Noticeboard Press Releases, Coverage, Request a Press Release Data?, Resources for Economists, Data on Other sites Membership information Login, Create a Profile, Profile Benefits, Your Profile Settings, Forgot Your Password? Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback How to find us, Frequently Asked Questions, ESRC Site Guide, Frequently Asked Questions, Vacancies, How to Search Site Map, How to find us, How to Order Publications, Privacy Policy, Feedback CEPR Home Page You have items in your shopping cart.  Click to view your cart
Google
http://cepr.org/

Creating Wealth in the Weightless Economy

Since 1900, and likely from long before, between 60 and 90 percent of the growth in output per worker in the advanced economies has been due to technical progress. Wealth creation has arisen, not from accumulating traditional physical capital, but from advances in the effectiveness and productivity of capital and labour inputs. Professor Danny Quah (London School of Economics and CEPR) argued, at a lunchtime meeting organized by CEPR and SNS on 29 September, that technological progress is now, and likely always has been, the single most important factor underlying continued advances in economic wellbeing in the richer countries. This remains true both at the national level and at the individual level.

Over the last two decades the greatest, most rapid, and most visible technical progress has occurred in that part of the economy which can be referred to as the ‘weightless economy'. This can be defined as a combination of information and communications technology (ICT), intellectual property – embedded in, among others, pharmaceutical products, electronic libraries, databases, and digital media. (Sometimes, one might include in this list other elements of the ‘creative’ sectors of the economy, although whether it is insightful, useful, or correct to do so, depends).

The rate of technical advance in the weightless economy dwarfs anything that had preceded it – including, significantly, the Industrial Revolution of the late 18th century, or the technical consolidations of the 19th century or early 20th century. The defining feature of the weightless economy is not just the high concentration of knowledge in the goods produced, but, more important, in the way weightless economy products themselves behave like knowledge. To a first approximation those products show infinite expansibility and inherent unknowability.

  • Infinite expansibility is when further use of a product does not draw down its original usefulness to other consumers. Computer software displays this; scientific knowledge displays this; electronic database and digital media content displays this.
  • Inherent unknowability is when the value of a product in use or consumption is uncertain, when consumers need to grow in sophistication to fully exploit a product. Computer software, scientific knowledge, and digital content, again, all increase in usefulness as users raise, correspondingly, their levels of sophistication – either through learning by doing on one's own or learning from one another in networks.

Education, in this broad interpretation, supports the demand side of the weightless economy, not just its supply side.

To succeed, continued wealth creation and economic progress – whether at the individual, national, or global level – has to acknowledge the increasing importance of the weightless economy and to exploit its peculiar properties. Marginal cost can be close to zero, thereby making conventional economic behaviour to price at marginal cost in equilibrium no longer feasible. However, market structures that support viable alternatives paradoxically deliver inherent social inefficiencies when they do work. Technical leaders can grow to be market successes, and incur unjustified popular criticism. Successes in the weightless economy do not derive from an inherited or established position. And they don't remain leaders for long without continually re-inventing their successes. Societies need to understand and to debate this trade-off between dynamic incentives and social inefficiency.

Centralisation does not provide the answer, and examples from history illustrate the dangers of expecting it to encourage and promote technical progress. Despite an Industrial Revolution in 17th-century China waiting to happen, with all technological ingredients in place, that economy failed to take off. A bureaucratic state shut off growth in demand and use of the new technology – paper and printing, mechanical and hydraulic power, chemical advances – and ended up stifling economic development. While economically and technologically ahead in 1400, China by 1900 was well behind the fast-growing industrially-advancing Western economies. Uncomprehending bureaucrats, fearful of the subversion of their authority, allowed their technical edge to wither away, and snatched disaster from the jaws of an economic miracle.

The weightless economy therefore brings opportunities and pitfalls. There is the possibility of ongoing, unconstrained economic growth; no natural bound is apparent. There is the possibility of a dramatic concentration of wealth and economic power. But at the same time, in well-functioning markets there can be mobility: whoever is on top does not always have to remain there. Finally, there are infinite possibilities for national and social policy mistakes, with disastrous consequences. Understanding the choices to be made and the technological forces underlying them is, at this stage, critical for continued economic success.

Notes for Editors:

CEPR is a network of over 450 Research Fellows based throughout Europe, who collaborate through the Centre in research and its dissemination. CEPR helps its Research Fellows to develop projects, obtain their funding, administer them and disseminate their results. The Centre’s research ranges from open economy macroeconomics to trade policy, from the economic transformation of Central and Eastern Europe to regionalism in the world economy. The views expressed in the briefing are the author’s own. CEPR is an ESRC Resource Centre. For further information about CEPR, please contact Rita Gilbert, External Relations Officer, Tel 44 20 7878 2917, Fax 44 20 7878 2999 or by email on rgilbert@cepr.org.

Studieförbundet Näringsliv och Samhälle (SNS) was established in 1948 as an independent forum for the free exchange of ideas on economic and social issues among individuals in the private sector, policy community and the media in Sweden. it currently has approximately 4,000 individual members and150 corporate subscribers, including most of Sweden’s largest corporations in the private and public sectors. SNS is not affiliated with any political parties or interest groups, but maintains a close relationship with the Swedish academic community and with organizations and research institutes in other countries. SNS carries out academic research, issues a variety of policy studies and other publications and organizes seminars and conferences.

Danny Quah is Professor of Economics at the London School of Economics, and a Research Fellow in CEPR’s International Macroeconomics programme. He is also a Research Fellow at the Centre for Economic Performance based at the London School of Economics.

‘Technology in Growth’
CEPR Discussion Paper No. 1901
Louise C Keely and Danny Quah

Available for £5/$8/€8 plus a postage and packaging cost of 50p/$1/€1 (UK or Europe) or £1/$2/€2 (Rest of World) from
CEPR, 90-98 Goswell Rd, London EC1V 7RR
Tel (+44 20) 7878 2900 Fax (+44 20) 7878 2999
Email: orders@cepr.org

Your current location: Press
Top CEPR, 53-56 Great Sutton Street, London EC1V 0DG
United Kingdom.
Tel: +44 (0)20 7183 8801     Fax: +44 (0)20 7183 8820
Email: cepr@cepr.org     Webmaster: webmaster@cepr.org
Home
With the support of the European Union: Support for bodies active at European level in the field of active European citizenship